, 2015; Cardoso and Souza, 2016; Santiago and you can Saliba, 2016; 2 Santos and Jalalzai, 2021). In this works we shall focus on misogyny as the identified by our interviewees in the context of Rousseff’s six many years in the power, especially emphasizing the relationship anywhere between misogynistic backlash and gendered twice bind fictional character understood. From the adopting the section you can expect a more nuanced definition to own each one of the subcategories known (come across Dining table 2), getting sit-alone meanings and you will instances on investigation with detailed analyses regarding trick minutes within the Rousseff’s presidency that exemplify the vibrant between the nuanced offer for analyzing new gendered twice join, misogynist backlash, as well as effects into Rousseff’s presidency.
New four subcategories understood starred in the info at different accounts (find Dining tables step 3, 4). One or two themes appeared in higher ratio: Research to Guys and Misogynyments inspired due to the fact testing in order to dudes checked during the nearly 1 / 2 of every interview and represented thirty six percent off all the comments codifiedments styled since the misogyny was basically almost all comments (38 %) and you will starred in 49 % of all of the interviews. This means, interviewees were really cognizant out-of Rousseff’s role since the president in contrast to many other male politicians and you can former presidents, and the means Rousseff is punished throughout her administration on account of gendered expectation and backlash.
When you’re lookin having reduced frequency regarding the interviews, another several themes promote extremely important framework to help you knowledge you’ll be able to sexist backlash inside presidency out-of Brazil’s basic lady president. Conversations precisely how Rousseff attempted to comply with gendered criterion ascribed to women (Conforming into Twice Join) appeared in more than 10 % of your remark coded and interview presented. Meanwhile, talk about how precisely Rousseff challenged the newest gendered expectations of their own reputation (Challenging the fresh Twice Bind) appeared in more one to fifth of all of the interviews, constituting 16 % of all the comments coded.
The new breakdown of one’s mathematical density of your thematic studies will bring a starting point to help you a beneficial qualitative study of any theme, targeting the partnership between for each and every motif, particularly the partnership within about three layouts individually linked to the new gendered twice join (analysis, conforming, and challenging) therefore the misogynistic backlash one then followed.
Assessment so you’re able to men
One of several subcategories understood is actually evaluations out-of Dilma Rousseff to Г¤r Mexikansk kvinnor de vackraste dudes, each other comparing Rousseff to male political figures and you can detailing just how things would be more when the Rousseff was indeed a person. Ergo, we discovered that there is each other an abstract parts and you can important aspect of their own assessment so you’re able to guys. From inside the an abstract experience, we quite often noticed the word, “in the event the she was indeed men” to describe just how a situation could have played aside in different ways had Dilma maybe not been a lady. The fresh new narrative depicted within our interview is actually out-of a system one to “likes dudes” (Respondent 88, ), that have “no discover gender discrimination, nevertheless the undeniable fact that [a politician] try one try a plus” (Respondent 8, ). When revealing this investigations significantly more concretely, there is certainly a watch Rousseff’s abrasive identity, the fresh “difficult woman doing delicate dudes.” The newest quotation less than will bring a lot more framework:
Conversations throughout the Rousseff’s impeachment as well as the sexism and you can misogyny behind new techniques had been chatted about during the popular news (Hao, 2016; Hertzman, 2016; Romero and Kaiser, 2016) plus scholarly works (Zdebskyi et al
Sure, as well as mentioned that she is an arduous individual, one she could not correspond with anyone, you to she got an enthusiastic authoritarian technique for talking. Whatever for men looks like an accompany “no, he or she is an arduous people, a home-confident person who understands just what he wants.” So you can their own try displayed as negative “no, she doesn’t learn how to chat, she is tough, she’s this” in an awful ways. How they correspond with united states, female. You will find hit a specific condition, we are being harsh, our company is deviating out of to help you how to be a woman, that is sweet, clear, silent and you will including. The form of Dilma getting is the brand of ladies who be able to feel solid contained in this a completely patriarchal industry, against which acquisition you to is present (Respondent 79, ).